- ₹10M of additional revenue, approximately
- 100% automated: registration, payment, enrolment, live scoring and streaming
- 100% transparent: selection, scoring, ranking and accounting
Two associations, and what actually changed.
Zeetius has run state and national associations since 2018. These two are documented end to end — the work before, the work after, and the officer who signed it off. Every quote on this page is reproduced in the words it was published in.
The case studies
Both associations arrived doing the same job by hand. Neither of them still does.
- ¾ of the association’s human effort across its operations, removed
From the chair and the committee
Association and federation officers, quoted as published. They are running national ranking tournaments and international challenges, not a pilot.
The most advanced software being used in badminton live scoring today. We are getting results handy on our finger tips. It reduces cost — no extra expense on LAN networking, less expensive tablets — and it is the cleanest way to show the technology here. I will recommend this software to the national federation to adopt at the earliest.
Zeetius is very useful to use. It greatly assisted us in our development efforts, and it is easy to handle and assign at the same time. A very co-operative working team — thank you.
I have used Zeetius several times since 2019, for national and international tournaments alike. It has been very helpful to me as a match controller: the application provides live updates, generates the different reports, and manages everything seamlessly. Most importantly, this wireless software contributes to a cleaner and more environmentally friendly venue.
Having relied on Zeetius since 2019 for numerous national and international tournaments, I can attest to its invaluable role as a match controller. Live updates, report generation and seamless management have consistently streamlined my responsibilities. Zeetius truly stands out in enhancing efficiency and sustainability.
Umpires, referees and match controllers have been saying the same thing for longer. The whole published set: All testimonials on zeetius.com
What the two have in common
- The manual work goes, not the controlBoth associations automated the clerical half of the job and kept every decision — selection, sanction, ranking — with the people elected to make it.
- It paid for itselfOne association found close to ten million rupees of revenue it was not collecting; the other found three-quarters of its staff effort.
- It survived a real seasonNeither of these is a pilot. Both have run state and national tournaments through complete ranking cycles.
Elsewhere in the platform
Bring us the season that went wrong.
The most useful first conversation is not a feature tour. Tell us about the registration deadline that collapsed, the ranking you could not defend, or the fees nobody can reconcile — and we will show you that part of the platform.
- A reply within two working days From someone who has run a federation season, not a form-handling queue.
- Your data, in the demo Send a spreadsheet of members or a past draw sheet and we will load it before we meet.
- A migration plan, in writing What moves, what cannot, and what it costs — before you commit to anything.