Appointments a convenor can justify.
Officiating is where federations get accused of favouritism, and the accusation is hard to answer with a group chat. This module keeps the accredited pool current, proposes a slate with the reason attached to each name, and lets the convenor change anything — on the record.
- Referee K. Andersson Proposed Well below the squad average this season
- Deputy referee P. Novak Proposed Qualified and available for these dates
- Match controller A. Ferreira Accepted Accepted 11 minutes ago
- Umpire S. Marek Awaiting Invited, awaiting a reply
- Umpire R. Costa Excluded Stood down, conflict of interest
The platform proposes and a person decides. Nothing is appointed until the convenor confirms it.
Why it matters
- Appointments that survive scrutinyEvery proposal arrives with its reasoning attached, so a convenor is explaining a decision rather than defending a hunch.
- Fairness you can showAppointments per official against the squad average, ready to export — before anyone asks to see it.
- Fewer gaps on the dayAvailability and conflicts are known in advance, so a fixture is not being re-staffed the night before.
Elsewhere in the platform
Bring us the season that went wrong.
The most useful first conversation is not a feature tour. Tell us about the registration deadline that collapsed, the ranking you could not defend, or the fees nobody can reconcile — and we will show you that part of the platform.
- A reply within two working days From someone who has run a federation season, not a form-handling queue.
- Your data, in the demo Send a spreadsheet of members or a past draw sheet and we will load it before we meet.
- A migration plan, in writing What moves, what cannot, and what it costs — before you commit to anything.